Maniar, H (2020) Contingency management in Indian construction projects. Journal of Construction Business and Management, 4(2), pp. 11-24. ISSN 2521-0165
Abstract
The successful completion of Indian construction projects possesses an inherent uncertainty due to the nature of the construction industry along with prevailing tepid recovery of the Indian economy, which has made it difficult for construction companies to achieve required operational and financial performance. This necessitates having accurate project cost estimation and efficient contingency management to shield unknown project risk and address cost overrun problems. Therefore, this study aims to assess the current state, the issues faced in contingency management and evaluating the effectiveness of contingency in overcoming cost overrun problems in Indian construction companies. The study preferred a quantitative approach in capturing the required data by using structured questionnaires collected from 100 Indian construction companies (of contractors, vendors/suppliers, customers, and consultants) out of 335 companies with a response rate of 30%. This, along with archival data analysis of 50 Indian construction projects completed between calendar year 2014 to 2019. The captured data were analysed using simple statistical tools like Relative Importance Index (RII), mean score, standard deviation and ranking methods to ensure relevant results aligned with research objectives. The result findings of the study revealed that 60% of Indian construction companies preferred the traditional percentage method for contingency sum percentage addition to estimated project cost (a subjective approach based on the historical project performance) which may not be adequate in overcoming cost overrun problems. Archival data analysis found that contingency consideration was effective in accommodating cost overrun problems in 9 (18%) projects out of 50 projects. The study further found that contingency was utilised in an unplanned mode and having unclear contingency forecasting strategies. Based on result findings and observations, this study concludes that contingency should be estimated based on the scientific approach in place of a subjective approach to address project risks adequately, this along contingency consideration should be an integral part of the project risk assessment and should be effectively utilised during the execution stage.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contingency; cost overruns; financial performance; India; operational finance; questionnaire survey; risk management |
| Index terms: | project cost, survey, construction company, relative importance index, strategy, data analysis, questionnaire, financial performance, construction project, estimation, cost overrun, deviation, forecasting, recovery, construction industry, India, effectiveness, project performance, operational finance, risk management, risk assessment |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, production management, Geography, project management theory and practice, financial risk, management, financial management, business analysis, economics, performance management, data analysis and analytics, financial and cost management, prediction and forecasting, operations management, data collection methods, risk assessment, organization |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Risk Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here