Dada, J O and Bamigboye, G O (2021) Diagnosing the causes of quackery in quantity surveying practice in Lagos State, Nigeria. Journal of Construction Business and Management, 5(1), pp. 28-37. ISSN 2521-0165
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to examine the causes of quackery in quantity surveying practice to address the menace for enhanced service delivery. Using survey research design, primary data were collected through the administration of structured questionnaires on quantity surveyors in the 125 registered quantity surveying firms in Lagos State, Nigeria. The respondents were asked to rate the identified 34 causes of quackery in quantity surveying practice on a 5-point Likert scale. The elicited data were analysed using mean score analysis. Factor analysis was, after that, used to explore and detect the underlying relationship among the identified variables and categorise them into key factors. The results of the mean score statistics identified 32 important causes of quackery in quantity surveying practice, with the four most important ones being an unwillingness to seek professional advice and consultation, unwillingness to pay for professional services, lack of effective systems of punishment for quacks and inadequate monitoring by the quantity surveying professional association and regulatory body. It was concluded that the causes of quackery in quantity surveying are multidimensional and can be narrowed down to unethical practices, client engagement, job security, regulatory and corruption-related issues. The identified causes of quackery in quantity surveying practice will be useful in formulating policy and serve as future research agenda towards eradicating the menace and engendering an enhanced service delivery.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | corruption; monitoring; policy; quantity surveying; service delivery; client; professional; quantity surveyor; gender; factor analysis; Nigeria |
| Index terms: | professional service, Likert scale, questionnaire, corruption, survey, research agenda, quantity surveying firm, quantity surveying practice, surveying, statistics, unethical practices, monitoring, Lagos State, factor analysis, research design, Nigeria, quantity surveying, service delivery |
| Subjects: | research management, professional ethics, statistical analysis, Geography, service delivery, ethical practice, health monitoring assessment and metrics, profession, data collection methods, organization, research design and methodology, mathematical modelling, control systems |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Organizational Design, Site Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here