Sospeter, N G; Chang'ah, A and Rwelamila, P D (2024) Re-imagining the factors influencing the choice of project management tools and techniques in Tanzanian infrastructure projects: Elicitation of practitioners' perspectives. Journal of Construction Business and Management, 7(1), pp. 34-45. ISSN 2521-0165
Abstract
Construction project Management tools and Techniques (CPMTT) are vital for the success of construction projects. Nonetheless, there is a paucity of studies that examined the factors influencing the choice of CPMTT in developing countries, particularly, Tanzania. The objective of the study was to analyze the factors influencing the choice of CPMTT in Tanzanian public infrastructure projects, with the aim to fill the knowledge gap. The study was descriptive in nature and employed a mixed method approach. Using purposive and snowball sampling techniques, data was collected from 60 out of 70 Project management practitioners including Consultants and project Coordinators within Dar-es-salaam Metropolitan Development Projects (DMDP) and similar infrastructure projects. Fifty valid responses were received equivalent to 83% response rate and interviews were done. Quantitative data from respondents was analyzed using IBM SPSS v25. The directed content analysis method was employed for qualitative data from 10 Resident Engineers to supplement the quantitative results. Using factor analysis, four groups of organization support, ease of access and usefulness of tools, fulfilment of project objectives, and project environment and idea generation were determined to influence the choice of CPMTT. Project managers frequently choose tools that are easily accessible without considering the organization's project objectives or resource commitment. The findings could be used as a guide for project practitioners to critically assess the areas of weakness and select CPMTT that can help address those weaknesses and hence improve project delivery in Tanzania, an unexplored context. Project managers are called to re-imagine project needs based on priority and select the CPMTT that satisfies the needs based on experience, skills and project objectives as crucial factors in the selection of CPMTT rather than using their discretion. This would improve the delivery of infrastructure projects and, hence, performance outcomes in the construction sector in Tanzania and other emerging countries. This study was limited to DMDP public infrastructure projects in Tanzania.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | decision analysis; mixed-methods; Tanzania |
| Index terms: | sampling, construction project management, factor analysis, infrastructure project, project delivery, project management, resident engineer, emerging country, public infrastructure, performance outcome, project manager, Tanzania, mixed method, decision analysis, construction project, practitioner, construction sector, developing country, interview, commitment, content analysis |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis, statistical analysis, production management, Geography, development economics, project management theory and practice, psychology, data analysis and analytics, project delivery, data collection methods, profession, practitioner, value management |
| Topics: | International Construction, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here