Tembo, M; Kahanji, C and Mwanaumo, E M (2024) Cultivating procurement strategies to manage the tender price level for public infrastructure: : A case study of IRCP (World Bank) projects in Zambia. Journal of Construction Business and Management, 7(1), pp. 16-33. ISSN 2521-0165
Abstract
Public infrastructure-based clients implement extant procurement strategies without carefully evaluating particular requirements to select and adapt the most appropriate practices that cultivate the best and most practical benefits of a chosen procurement strategy. The study explored procurement strategies for managing and optimizing construction tender-price levels. The study is an exploratory case study utilizing a desktop review of numerous publications, public domain reports, and person-to-person interviews. The choice of methodology corresponds to the specific nature of the research environment and phenomena characterization of the lack of detailed primary research. The research involves a robust examination of documents and trend analysis of public procurement. It results from extensive extant literature, nine case study packages of improved rural connectivity projects (IRCP), and 21 expert interviews. Improved rural connectivity project (IRCP) is a World Bank-funded project for improving Zambia’s rural road accessibility and strengthening institutional capacity. Eight fundamental characteristics related to a successful procurement strategy identified are cash flow assurance, guaranteed payments, and completeness of designs. Other characteristics include level and type of competition, contractor’s breakeven point, adopted procurement process (work packaging), nature of government support, and protecting market share. The study further identifies central areas for developing a successful and responsive procurement strategy: procurement planning, preferential procurement policy (protectionism), and establishing differential procurement laws. These findings form an appropriate basis for developing relevant procurement practices that improve a procurement strategy for managing construction bid prices. The study indicates the possibility of further exploiting the potential of current procurement strategies for managing construction prices by suggesting a link between poor tender-price management and a high occurrence of procurement-related lapses. The findings highlight gaps only identifiable in tender-price management studies when taking a client perspective and considering the procurement context. This study assists to develop procurement strategies that enhance the chance of deriving value for money while maintain reasonable price levels.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; construction tender price; procurement strategy; public projects |
| Index terms: | case study, public infrastructure, package, accessibility, government support, market share, Zambia, World Bank, procurement strategy, documents, strengthening, competition, methodology, public project, publication, value-for-money, procurement process, connectivity, procurement policy, cash flow, interview, tender price |
| Subjects: | public policy, contractual arrangements, institutional frameworks, data collection methods, research dissemination and communication, government bodies, networking, market analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, financial management, structural engineering, research methods, tendering, inclusive design, Geography, professional development, infrastructure engineering, evaluation |
| Topics: | Value Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Governance, Procurement, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here