Innovation barriers and enablers that affect productivity in Uganda building industry

Alinaitwe, H M; Widén, K; Mwakali, J and Hansson, B (2007) Innovation barriers and enablers that affect productivity in Uganda building industry. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 12(1), pp. 59-75. ISSN 1823-6499

Abstract

The construction industry has of recent been blamed for lack of innovation. Lack of innovation in the industry is believed to be responsible for the decreasing or stagnant levels of productivity in comparison with other industries. This paper reviews the major barriers and enablers to innovation in general. Propositions were made about the factors that affect innovation in the construction industry which were then formulated into a questionnaire. A survey was made on building contractors in Uganda, a developing country, targeting those with financial strength, large in size, and with high capacity to carry out big projects. The identified factors were then ranked and correlated. The level of training in science, engineering and technical education, and the level of research and development at the industry level are looked at as the greatest innovation enablers in building that will drive forward labour productivity. The size of the domestic market and the level of security are the worst innovation barriers that lead to low productivity in the building industry in Uganda. Contractors, policy makers and the government should address the identified factors in order to improve productivity.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction industry; enablers; innovation barriers; productivity; Uganda
Index terms: building contractor, productivity, building industry, labour productivity, construction industry, Uganda, developing country, innovation barrier, science, survey, research and development, questionnaire
Subjects: industry analysis, research management, Geography, development economics, management, specialized education, practitioner, innovation studies, data collection methods
Topics: Site Management, Education, International Construction, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here