Construction technology diffusion in developing countries: Limitations of prevailing innovation systems

van Egmond-deWilde de Ligny, E and Erkelens, P (2008) Construction technology diffusion in developing countries: Limitations of prevailing innovation systems. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 13(2), pp. 43-63. ISSN 1823-6499

Abstract

The diffusion of innovative technologies in the market is usually a complex and difficult process with a varying degree of success and the effects of the diffused innovative technologies are very un-balanced. The objective of our research is to gain insight into the reasons why the diffusion of innovative technology fails, even though they promise a superior performance compared to incumbent technologies. Drawing on innovation systems theories, we have identified and used the concepts of technological regime, actor network and technology sets to analyze technology diffusion in a case study in the dwelling construction industry in Costa Rica. The results showed bottlenecks in the prevailing innovation system that curtailed the diffusion of an innovative construction technology.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: actor network; construction industry; diffusion; innovation system; technological regime
Index terms: construction industry, construction technology, technological regime, Costa Rica, case study, innovation system, drawing, developing country
Subjects: technical documentation, innovation and technology management, data collection methods, digital engineering, business, industry analysis, Geography, development economics
Topics: Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Design Practice, International Construction
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here