Waters, J; Neale, R; Hutson, S and Mears, K (2005) A perceptual assessment of personal safety in relation to university campus facilities. In: Khosrowshahi, F (ed.) Proceedings of 21st Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-9 September 2005, London, UK.
Abstract
This research explores users' perceptions of personal safety in relation to university campus environments. This useful exercise in facilities management provides guidance on how the physical facilities of the campus may be modified, if necessary, to enhance users' sense of personal safety. The research uses a methodology derived from an earlier study of railway stations, which resulted in extensive additions and alterations. Perceptions are a valid source from which to identify issues of concern for campus users and in the development of appropriate solutions to ensure that university facilities promote personal safety. Using the University of Glamorgan as a case study, the authors used QuickTime software to produce virtual representations of the campus environment as an environmental stimulus in a series of focus groups to explore campus users' perceptions. As well as identifying locations on campus that generated fear, those which inspired positive senses of personal safety were also considered. Preliminary findings demonstrated that although the University of Glamorgan is a relatively safe campus, users expressed some concern for their personal safety at night. A perceived increase in risk was particularly related to the lack of natural daylight, insubstantial levels of street lighting and a reduction in the social presence.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | fear; perceptions; personal safety; risk; university campuses |
| Index terms: | facilities management, methodology, street lighting, presence, university facility, railway station, focus group, exercise, case study |
| Subjects: | research methods, management, infrastructure and transport systems, data collection methods, construction type, health behaviours and lifestyles, environmental science |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here