Dos Santos, A; da Rocha, C G and Lepre, P (2010) Barriers and opportunities in developing 'do-it-yourself' products for low-income housing. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 15(1), pp. 29-43. ISSN 1823-6499
Abstract
Direct involvement of the user in the assembling process of his/her own products or even entire house is a reality among low-income populations in developing countries. Nevertheless, there are a limited number of products that have actually been designed from a do-it-yourself (DIY) perspective, which results in several problems, such as poor user safety while the product is being assembled or inadequate results from an improvised assembling. Hence, the main goal of this paper is to analyse barriers to and opportunities for developing DIY products for low-income housing in developing countries. The research method utilises a case study of a DIY product consisting of a hybrid solution that acted as both a partition wall and a wardrobe. The identified opportunities included more systematic use of existing craft competencies among low-income families and the possibility of cost reduction through DIY concepts. Major barriers included the perception of the DIY product as inferior and the difficulty of communicating the DIY assembly process to users who quite often are illiterate.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | do-it-yourself; furniture design; low-income; partition wall; sustainable design |
| Index terms: | case study, low-income housing, income, furniture design, developing country, sustainable design, partition wall, do-it-yourself, population, cost reduction |
| Subjects: | design process, development economics, design practice, architectural elements, economics, demography, housing and residential development, data collection methods, economic analysis |
| Topics: | International Construction, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here