Suksuwan, N and Hadikusumo, B H (2010) Condition rating system for Thailand's concrete bridges. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 15(1), pp. 1-27. ISSN 1823-6499
Abstract
The Bridge Management System (BMS) is designed to maximise use of available data and determine the optimal strategy to perform necessary improvements to bridges in the most cost-effective manner. This paper provides a condition rating system to meet the requirements of Thailand's Department of Highways (DOH). A rating system to assess the existing condition of bridges is proposed. Segmental inspection is developed to execute efficient element-level evaluations and collect data that demonstrate deterioration patterns in bridge elements. The paper also describes inspection procedures for field survey execution, which enables observed distresses at the level of sub-elements or members to be allocated. Recommendations from bridge experts reveal that the proposed rating system is robust, implementable in actual practice, and suitable for efficient application in evaluating the nation's concrete highway bridges. Although the bridge condition rating was developed in response to the specific characteristics of Thailand's bridges, the proposed methodology can easily be extended to other bridge agencies.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bridge condition rating; bridge data collection forms; bridge element distresses; segmental evaluation; visual inspection |
| Index terms: | methodology, bridge condition rating, agency, management system, deterioration, survey, visual inspection, strategy, Thailand, concrete bridge, distress, inspection, concrete highway |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, professional practice, material degradation and durability, Geography, structural engineering, management, research methods, infrastructure and transport systems, quality assurance, asset management, sociology |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Quality Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here