Influence of project plans on the outcome of construction projects procured by design-build in Nigeria

Idoro, G I (2012) Influence of project plans on the outcome of construction projects procured by design-build in Nigeria. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 17(2), pp. 81-103. ISSN 1823-6499

Abstract

This study evaluates the influence of project plans on the outcome of design-build projects. The purpose is to ascertain whether the level of use of project plans can be utilised to improve the outcome of projects procured by the design-build method. To achieve this purpose, a field survey of 42 projects procured by the design-build method and selected by stratified random sampling was conducted. Data were collected with the aid of structured questionnaires and analysed using percentage, mean and the Spearman correlation test. The results of the study indicate that the level of use of project plans has significant influence on some parameters of the design-build projects' outcome. The results also indicate that the inception, design, tendering and construction plans are not prepared in many of the projects sampled. The study concludes that the level of use of project plans can be used to reduce the high time and cost overruns recorded in design-build projects and that there is room for stakeholders to increase the level of use of project plans in design-build projects. The study suggests that stakeholders should ensure that the required project plans are prepared when projects are procured by design-build.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Nigeria; procurement method; project outcome; project planning
Index terms: survey, project planning, construction project, questionnaire, cost overrun, project outcome, Nigeria, procurement method, level of use, sampling
Subjects: performance management, production management, Geography, financial and cost management, contractual arrangements, project completion, data collection methods, control systems
Topics: Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Cost Management, Procurement, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here