Influence of the monitoring and control strategies of indigenous and expatriate Nigerian contractors on project outcome

Idoro, G I (2012) Influence of the monitoring and control strategies of indigenous and expatriate Nigerian contractors on project outcome. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 17(1), pp. 51-69. ISSN 1823-6499

Abstract

Monitoring and control are very important management functions for ensuring that project objectives are fully achieved. this study compares the level and effectiveness of the efforts of indigenous and expatriate nigerian contractors on project monitoring and control. the aim of this study is to establish whether the project monitoring and control efforts of the contractors contribute to an improved project outcome. the study's objectives are to compare the frequencies at which project monitoring and control strategies are used by nigerian contractors and their influence on project outcome. a field survey was conducted using a sample of 86 contractors selected by stratified random sampling. the data were collected using structured questionnaires and analysed using the mean, t-test and spearman correlation test. the results of the study reveal that indigenous contractors carry out project control strategies more frequently than expatriate contractors. furthermore, three of the eight monitoring and control strategies influence the project outcome, while the remaining strategies do not; this result indicates that while some of the strategies are effective, others are not. contractors should thus ensure that their project monitoring and control efforts are directed towards improving the entire outcomes of their projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: contractors; Nigeria; project control; project monitoring; project outcome
Index terms: Nigeria, project outcome, project control, monitoring, sampling, effectiveness, strategy, survey, project monitoring, questionnaire
Subjects: Geography, performance management, management, control systems, project completion, data collection methods
Topics: Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Site Management, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here