Oluwatayo, A A and Amole, D (2012) Culture of architectural firms in Nigeria: An exploratory study. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 17(2), pp. 1-21. ISSN 1823-6499
Abstract
What is the culture of an architectural firm, and what are the organisational characteristics that shape this culture? These are the questions addressed by this paper that surveys 92 Nigerian architectural firms. The study investigated the culture of these architectural firms using the response of the firms' principals to a questionnaire of value statements regarding innovation, stability, people orientation, outcome orientation, team orientation and aggressiveness. The culture types were determined using a two-step cluster analysis of the data. Categorical regression was also used to determine the factors that shaped a firm's culture. The study revealed that the architectural firms did not have either market or hierarchical cultures. The findings also challenged the notion that larger firms tend to be more impersonal. However, the predominance of responsive and staff-oriented cultures confirmed the notion that service sector organisations are more people-oriented than outcome-oriented confirms. The leadership style of the principals best predicted a firm's culture.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architectural firms; culture; culture types; organisational culture; values |
| Index terms: | organizational characteristic, culture type, Nigeria, architectural firm, organizational culture, questionnaire, cluster analysis, exploratory study, survey, leadership style, stability |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, business, data analysis and analytics, structural engineering, research methods, Geography, cross-cultural studies, sociology, leadership |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, International Construction, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here