Santoso, D S; Joewono, T B; Wibowo, A; Sinaga, H P A and Santosa, W (2012) Public-private partnerships for tollway construction and operation: Risk assessment and allocation from the perspective of investors. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 17(2), pp. 45-66. ISSN 1823-6499
Abstract
This study aims to assess and allocate the key risk events for public-private partnerships in Indonesian tollway construction and operation. The data were collected from a risk assessment survey of tollway companies in Indonesia based on two perspectives: the degrees of occurrence and impact. The top-ranked risk events (18 out of 55 risks) generated from the value-of-risk index are the focus of this study and the relationships among risk events are analysed and explained using risk mechanism models. Risks related to land acquisition were identified as the major risk events in the Indonesian tollway business and 10 out of the 18 top-ranked risk events were judged as suitable for assumption by the government. The weather risk should be shared by both parties with the remaining risks borne by the investor. The findings are expected to be useful for government review of regulations and practices and for private sectors interested in investing in tollway projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | assessment; cooperation; developing countries; Indonesia; infrastructure; risk |
| Index terms: | cooperation, weather, land acquisition, regulation, survey, developing country, risk assessment, private sector, partnership, Indonesia, investor |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, air quality, psychology, real estate economics, Geography, development economics, financial risk, partnership management, sociology, industry analysis, political science |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Geographical Context, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Governance, Stakeholder Management, International Construction, Urban Studies, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here