Alinaitwe, H and Ayesiga, R (2013) Success factors for the implementation of public-private partnerships in the construction industry in Uganda. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 18(2), pp. 1-14. ISSN 1823-6499
Abstract
With growing needs for infrastructure financing, many economies are turning to off-balance-sheet financing. In Uganda, for example, the ministry in charge of finance has been trying to find ways to implement projects funded using public-private partnership (PPP) arrangements. PPPs are risk-sharing investments in the provision of public goods and services, seen by governments as a means of launching investment programmes that would not be possible in reasonable amounts of time within the available public-sector budget. However, there has been no in-depth analysis of the factors that are likely to affect the success of PPP projects in developing countries. The objective of the present study is to address this gap and contribute to the knowledge base of success factors for PPP projects in developing countries, using Uganda as a base for data collection. Success factors were identified from the literature and validated using interviews with the three major types of stakeholders in the construction industry, i.e., contractors who represent the private sector and representatives of financial institutions and government departments, who are largely charged with the construction of public facilities. Using questionnaire surveys, the various factors were rated. The factors were then ranked in terms of the importance of the factors for each of the parties involved, using the coefficient of variation. A competitive procurement process, a well-organised private sector, the availability of competent personnel to participate in PPP project implementation, and good governance are the most important cross-cutting factors identified.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; public-private partnerships; success factors; Uganda |
| Index terms: | interview, procurement process, programme, knowledge base, survey, financing, success factor, private sector, construction industry, public good, personnel, implementation, governance, Uganda, questionnaire, variation, infrastructure financing, developing country, partnership |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, financial risk, contractual arrangements, management, development economics, information systems, health monitoring assessment and metrics, business, partnership management, Geography, economic analysis, industry analysis, contractual condition, project controls |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Health and Safety, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, International Construction, Geographical Context, Cost Management, Time Control, Governance, Contract Administration, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here