Giddings, B; Anyigor, K and Matthews, L (2013) Social structures, local economic development and environmental quality in deprived communities: The case of the Kpirikpiri community in South-East Nigeria. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 18(1), pp. 109-133. ISSN 1823-6499
Abstract
As recently as late 2010, Africa sought a 20% increase in funding for its poor countries despite years of international aid. In 2002, Nigeria's Ebonyi State became part of the Community-Based Urban Development Project and, in 2005, joined the Community-Based Poverty Reduction Project, both funded by the World Bank. Ebonyi focused all of the aid it received on three communities in its capital, Abakiliki. The three communities were chosen because they exhibited the lowest social, political and economic status and the highest levels of physical decay based on a survey in 2001. One of the three communities, Kpirikpiri, was surveyed again in 2010 as part of this research and in 2011, a sample of its residents participated in focus groups to evaluate how their lives had improved as a result of this funding. It was shocking to discover that the community still suffered from all five housing deprivations used by UN-Habitat to define slum conditions. Yet, the potential of these residents is high. The challenge is how to unlock their potential and establish community organisations that can apply for their own funding; develop a local economy through activities, such as home-based enterprises; negotiate with landlords, and start to improve their environmental conditions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | developing countries; economic development; environment; participation |
| Index terms: | slum, survey, poverty, environmental quality, Africa, landlord, Nigeria, deprivation, environmental conditions, local economy, developing country, housing, focus group, social structure, funding, urban development, World Bank, community-based, economic development |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, sociology, development economics, construction type, Geography, sustainability assessment, institutional frameworks, economic analysis, regions and continents, environmental science, social theory, economic development, communities and social development, social justice, urban design |
| Topics: | Governance, Geographical Context, Urban Studies, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Ethics, Sustainability, International Construction, Research Practice, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here