Daniel, M M (2014) Evaluating the determinants for access to subsidised mortgage housing in Jos, Nigeria. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 19(2), pp. 87-109. ISSN 1823-6499
Abstract
Nigeria's subsidised mortgage system operates on the assumption that workers would subscribe to a scheme (National Housing Fund [NHF]) as a precondition for access to housing. The subsidised mortgages are limited in supply and the mechanism lacks efficiency and distributional equity. These issues are empirically examined in Jos. A survey was conducted among workers in 24 randomly selected organisations. A total of 543 questionnaires were administered and 410 were retrieved. Analysis employing Pearson's chi square indicates a low-level of participation and a lack of awareness about the NHF scheme. There are negative feelings about the arrangement, and for the entire sample, gender and employment characteristics were found to have statistically significant relationships with participation in the NHF scheme. However, access to subsidised mortgage is influenced only by gender and tier of government employment. It is concluded that participation in the NHF scheme is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for access to mortgages in Jos. These findings call for increased awareness about NHF and improved efficiency in its administration. As the study was limited to the city of Jos, the methodology could be used to corroborate the evidence in other Nigerian cities.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | finances; housing; Jos; Nigeria; subsidy |
| Index terms: | housing, evidence, questionnaire, methodology, survey, Jos, determinant, mortgage, Nigeria, employment, efficiency, subsidy |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, construction type, risk assessment, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, performance management, research methods, management, Geography |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Risk Management, Construction Technology, Human Resources, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here