Post-evaluation system in construction projects in Gaza Strip-Palestine

Enshassi, A A; Arain, F and El-Rayyes, Y (2014) Post-evaluation system in construction projects in Gaza Strip-Palestine. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 19(2), pp. 51-73. ISSN 1823-6499

Abstract

A construction project can be described as successful when it is completed on time, within budget and according to specifications. Post-evaluation plays a major role in the construction industry when determining whether the project is a success or a failure. The objectives of this paper are as follows: to provide an overview of an organisation's interest in the post-evaluation system of the construction projects in the Gaza Strip, to identify and rank the most important factors used in the post-evaluation system for construction projects, to identify the obstacles of the post-evaluation system and to determine the factors that lead to a successful post-evaluation system. A structured questionnaire was adopted in this study; 40 questionnaires were distributed to international organisations that implemented construction projects in the Gaza Strip. The ordinal data were analysed by the relative important index method, which was used to rank the factors and the groups of the questionnaire and the nominal data were analysed by the relative frequency or percentage. The research findings revealed that international organisations in the Gaza Strip are concerned with the post-evaluation system of construction projects because post-evaluation is required by all donors. Cost, time and quality are found to be the most important group factors for the post-evaluation system of construction projects. The factors that are used in the process of post-evaluation include the following: project efficiency, owner satisfaction, project effectiveness, safety, risks, change orders, resources, communication, procurement and the environment. Overloaded projects were found to be the largest obstacle to the process of post-evaluation. A lack of awareness about post-evaluation will increase the risk of not complying with donor requirements, which affects potential future funding. Evaluator efficiency was found to be the most important factor leading to a successful post-evaluation system. This paper recommends that organisations consider other factors, such as safety and environmental impact. It is advisable to consider risk factors in the evaluation process because the Gaza Strip suffers from political and economic instability and to increase the evaluators' awareness concerning environmental and safety impacts in the evaluation process. The findings from this study would also be valuable for all construction professionals involved in the construction industry in general.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; donors; post-evaluation; project success
Index terms: specification, construction project, questionnaire, environmental impact, efficiency, Palestine, international organization, project success, satisfaction, owner, change order, funding, construction professional, risk factor, effectiveness, construction industry, donor, Gaza Strip
Subjects: performance management, physical geography and landforms, professional development, project management theory and practice, production management, Geography, contractual condition, sociology, environmental hazards, industry analysis, data collection methods, strategic management, environmental impact, project delivery, economic analysis
Topics: Business Strategy, Information Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, International Construction, Quality Management, Contract Administration
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here