Mishra, S P; Parbat, D K and Modak, J P (2014) Field data-based mathematical simulation of manual rebar cutting. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 19(1), pp. 111-126. ISSN 1823-6499
Abstract
Construction process activities are very complex in nature and there have been attempts to simulate them via numerous methods. Manual work, which constitutes a large proportion of total construction in India and developing countries, requires emphasis. Field data-based mathematical simulations develop an empirical relation between inputs and outputs; once the model is developed and weaknesses have been identified, methods can be easily improved and optimised for output goals. This paper covers in detail the process of developing models for the rebar cutting subactivity of reinforced concrete construction in residential buildings. These models are evaluated using sensitivity analysis, optimisation techniques and reliability analysis and are validated using artificial neural networks.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | field data-based mathematical simulation; human energy; performance error; productivity; rebar cutting |
| Index terms: | India, productivity, artificial neural network, residential building, sensitivity analysis, rebar, construction process, optimization technique, developing country, reliability analysis, human energy, performance error, reinforced concrete construction |
| Subjects: | building construction, construction type, algorithms, Geography, medical science and clinical practice, environmental hazards, modelling and simulation, building materials, performance management, development economics, management, reliability engineering |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Quality Management, Site Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Construction Technology, International Construction, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here