Hadikusumo, B H W and Tobgay, S (2015) Construction claim types and causes for a large-scale hydropower project in Bhutan. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 20(1), pp. 49-63. ISSN 1823-6499
Abstract
Hydropower construction projects are complex and uncertain, have long gestational periods and involve several parties. Furthermore, they require the integration of different components (Civil, Mechanical and Electrical) to work together as a single unit. These projects require highly specialised designs, detailed plans and specifications, high-risk construction methods, effective management, skilful supervision and close coordination. Thus, claims are common in such projects. These claims are undesirable because they require significant time and resources to resolve and cause adversarial relationships among the parties involved. Therefore, it is in the common interest of all involved parties to prevent, minimise, or resolve claims as amicably as possible. Identifying common claim types and their causes is essential in devising techniques to minimise and avoid them in future projects. This report details a case study performed on a large-scale hydropower project in Bhutan. The findings of this case study indicate that differing site conditions are the major contributor of impact and change claims and 95% of total claims can be settled by negotiation, whereas 5% of claims can be settled by arbitration.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | hydropower projects; construction claims; claim types; claim causes; claim frequency; claim severity |
| Index terms: | negotiation, coordination, arbitration, supervision, case study, hydropower project, Bhutan, integration, construction claim, specification, claim severity, construction method |
| Subjects: | building construction, payment, organizational analysis, conflict resolution, financial risk, Geography, contractual condition, management, control systems, dispute resolution, data collection methods, construction type |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Contract Administration, Organizational Design, Site Management, Cost Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here