Cost shares and factor-cost ratios in owner-built incremental housing in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

Sanga, S A and Lucian, C (2016) Cost shares and factor-cost ratios in owner-built incremental housing in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 21(1), pp. 113-130. ISSN 1823-6499

Abstract

The adoption of incremental owner-built techniques in housing construction relies on the associated lower cost compared to developer-built approaches. The mechanism that lowers cost is however, not obvious. This study is based on survey data that were collected using questionnaires which were distributed to 200 respondents in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania with response rate of 22.5%. The analysis results, based on descriptive statistics and regression analysis indicate that an incremental house-builder targeting an additional bedroom incrementally spends 28% lower annual construction cost and each additional square meter built, is associated with 0.4% lower cost. However, such lower cost comes at a 5%-10% longer completion time. These observations suggest that spreading costs over time reduces construction cost through multiple cost-saving channels opened up by time itself and factor intensity. The intensity of incremental housing construction favours increasing expenditure on labour than capital yielding a 5% reduction in annual cost but the greatest cost reduction benefit of up to 26% is realised through increasing expenditure on "capital" with fixed spending on materials during construction.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cost; Dar es Salaam; Tanzania; factor-cost ratios; housing; owner-built housing
Index terms: survey, builder, owner-built housing, factor-cost ratio, cost reduction, housing, bedroom, completion time, questionnaire, owner, construction cost, Tanzania, regression analysis, Dar es Salaam, statistics, residential construction
Subjects: mathematical modelling, data collection methods, construction type, practitioner, cost indicators, financial and cost management, construction integration, economics, economic development, architectural elements, Geography, sociology, project controls, statistical analysis
Topics: Research Practice, Geographical Context, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Time Control
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here