Examining the satisfaction level of construction workers regarding safety management in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Suresh, S; Renukappa, S; Alghanmi, I; Mushatat, S and Olayinka, R (2017) Examining the satisfaction level of construction workers regarding safety management in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 22(1), pp. 97-113. ISSN 1823-6499

Abstract

The importance of the construction industry in Saudi Arabia cannot be overemphasised, as it provides the infrastructure required for other sectors of the economy to grow, thus reflecting the level of economic development in the country. However, in Saudi Arabia, the construction industry is among the most hazardous, with a high level of accidents and fatalities. This study examines health and safety practices in the construction industry of Saudi Arabia and identifies opportunities for improvement. It also discusses the safety climate. The study adopted a quantitative approach in which a survey questionnaire was distributed and returned at a 60% response rate. The survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics with SPSS statistical software. The findings show that the Saudi Arabia construction industry has made improvements in health and safety standards; however, there are opportunities for further improvement. There are on-going efforts to maintain reasonable health and safety standards for employees on-site, but conditions off-site, particularly those of migrant employees on fixed-term labour contracts, are difficult. Unpaid wages and lack of welfare facilities contribute to physical and psychological stresses that are linked to impaired on-site performance, lack of motivation, lack of productivity and a lack of interest in adhering to health and safety guidelines. The study concludes that it is possible to improve health and safety in the construction industry through the effective enforcement of existing health and safety laws, enacting legislation regarding off-site health and safety for migrant workers, maintaining a fund for social security, and improving the regulation of commercial and contractual transactions. This study contributes to the knowledge of government policy and decision making in implementing health and safety regulations in the construction industry.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: health and safety practices; Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; safety climate and welfare
Index terms: safety climate, health and safety, wages, legislation, economic development, survey, motivation, regulation, migrant worker, questionnaire, decision-making, health and safety practices, safety climate and welfare, safety management, Saudi Arabia, satisfaction, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, productivity, government policy, construction industry, statistics, psychological stress, fatalities, construction worker, enforcement
Subjects: management, economic development, health risk and incident analysis, health safety and environment, Geography, business economics, occupational health and safety management, decision analysis, health conditions and diseases, industry analysis, political science, data collection methods, mathematical modelling, practitioner, psychology, public policy, legal systems, project delivery
Topics: Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Governance, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Human Resources, International Construction, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here