Time delay and cost overrun of road over bridge construction projects in India

Venkateswaran, C B and Murugasan, R (2017) Time delay and cost overrun of road over bridge construction projects in India. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 22(S1), pp. 79-96. ISSN 1823-6499

Abstract

This paper aims at studying the factors that contribute to time delay and cost overrun of Road over Bridge (ROB) projects in India. Data for the research study were collected from 62 respondents, including owners, contractors, and consultants of ROB projects. The literature survey and the questionnaire survey helped in identifying 29 factors. The topmost factors were ranked based on the frequency of occurrences. The correlation among owners, contractors, and consultants on ranking of factors was derived by Spearman rank correlation. Factor analysis was used to classify the factors into groups and identify the key groups responsible for time delay and cost overrun of projects. This study will help all stakeholders of ROB projects in India to understand the factors and thereby reduce time delay and cost overrun as well as expedite their completion.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cost overrun; infrastructure projects; land acquisition; road over bridges; time delay
Index terms: survey, questionnaire, construction project, land acquisition, road over bridge, cost overrun, owner, factor analysis, time delay, infrastructure project, India
Subjects: data collection methods, financial and cost management, real estate economics, Geography, production management, infrastructure engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, statistical analysis, project controls, sociology
Topics: Urban Studies, Time Control, Cost Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here