Kwofie, T E; Botchway, E A and Amos-Abanyie, S (2018) Examining the performance level of project management competencies of architects in Ghana using gap analysis approach. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 23(1), pp. 125-147. ISSN 1823-6499
Abstract
Evaluation of the performance level of key project management (PM) competencies of the various project teams is perceived as a recourse necessary for identifying potentially crucial and practical training needs of project team participants in PM practice. However, notable studies in this domain have primarily focused on the identification of critical PM competencies of project managers and engineers of the project team neglecting the architect who are equally important participants of construction project teams. This study focused on assessing the performance level of the critical PM competencies of the architect as a key team participant in project delivery. A quantitative method design was adopted involving a structured questionnaire survey of Ghanaian construction professionals who were selected through snow balling sampling. The data elicited were analysed using mean scores, Kruskal-Wallis test and gap analysis. The findings revealed that, architects show worse performance on seven critical competencies. The practical implication of the findings is that the disposition of architects PM behaviours can be ascertained as this can lend credence to legitimising corrective action through any potential continuing professional development programme and training in PM for architects in the Ghanaian construction industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architects; continuing professional development; project management; project management competencies |
| Index terms: | construction professional, sampling, architect, construction industry, project team, project management, project delivery, training need, construction project team, project manager, gap analysis, engineer, Ghana, questionnaire, quantitative method, continuing professional development, project management competency, programme, survey |
| Subjects: | project controls, industry analysis, performance measurement, educational resources, Geography, project management theory and practice, professional development, data analysis and analytics, project delivery, profession, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Procurement, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Education, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here