Building and construction research in Malaysia: A bibliometric analysis

Chan, T K (2019) Building and construction research in Malaysia: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 24(1), pp. 65-84. ISSN 1823-6499

Abstract

This paper presents a bibliometric analysis of building and construction research authored by researchers reporting an affiliation to institutions in Malaysia from years 2000 to 2015. The objectives are to identify the most productive research institutions and researchers, the research themes at these institutions, the output and impact of the research carried out and the most prolific authors. A search on the Scopus database identified 1,668 articles published during this period. The results indicate that research output was primarily from the five public research universities reflecting their privileged funding model and that output had increased rapidly in recent years. Topics of research were broad ranging from materials and structures in the engineering field, to the more conventional construction management and building science topics. Although numerous authors from Malaysia have high citation counts and h-indices, the overall impact of the research was low with many articles either published in low impact journals or received few citations. There is evidence of publication inflation where the increase in publication counts have not been matched by a comparable increase in citation counts. National innovation or research funding policies must rigorously address both the quantity and quality of research outputs to accurately assess impact.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bibliometric study; Malaysia; research output; research productivity
Index terms: research productivity, Malaysia, bibliometrics, research funding, inflation, journal, building science, bibliometric analysis, research institution, evidence, funding, publication, research output, database
Subjects: research management, data management, evaluation and assessment methods, engineering principles, economic analysis, research evaluation and metrics, Geography, research dissemination and communication, research products and data
Topics: Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Information Management, Digital Applications, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here