Moza, A and Paul, V K (2019) Analysis of claims in public works construction contracts in India. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 23(2), pp. 7-26. ISSN 1823-6499
Abstract
Majority of construction works are carried out through contracts and most of public works in India are modeled on General Conditions of Contract (GCC) formulated by Central Public Works Department (CPWD). Such Public Works Contracts have inherent limitations of being adapted on case to case and thus, are perceived to be rigid and prone to disputes. An attempt has been made to understand and evaluate the relationship between contract conditions and different claims that are usually encountered in construction disputes. An assessment has been done to determine the root cause of various claims with respect to contract conditions with a view of suggesting certain changes in GCC for effective contract management. Twenty two disputes in arbitration from CPWD have been considered and the claims subject to arbitration were studied and analysed. Classification and categorisation of claims was done and frequency of claims, quantum of amount claimed and amount awarded were determined for each type which was then related with the conditions of contract guiding them. Suggestions have been put forward on the basis of limited study as changes that can be made in GCC of CPWD, for avoiding the claims to arise in the first place.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | claim; contract; Central Public Works Department |
| Index terms: | construction work, construction contract, public work, construction dispute, arbitration, India, contract condition, dispute, contract management |
| Subjects: | contract management, infrastructure engineering, Geography, contract structure, operations management, dispute resolution, contract type |
| Topics: | Procurement, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management, Contract Administration, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 1 P |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here