Taxonomy of indigenous construction firms in South-South Nigeria

Ogbu, C P and Asuquo, C F (2019) Taxonomy of indigenous construction firms in South-South Nigeria. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 24(2), pp. 189-206. ISSN 1823-6499

Abstract

Contractors are generally grouped as small, medium or large, or, indigenous or foreign. An unsupervised statistically derived grouping of indigenous contractors hardly exists. Such a grouping is critical to policy formation for indigenous construction firms (ICFs) development in Nigeria. The objectives of this study were: (1) to group ICFs based on their characteristics and (2) to identify the significant characteristics that discriminate among the groups of ICFs. The ICFs (n = 575) studied were obtained from sample frames retrieved from construction industry professional bodies, the Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP) and internet sources. The results of the study were based on the demographic data of 428 of the ICFs that returned acceptably filled copies of the study questionnaire. Using cluster analysis, 97.9% of the ICFs were correctly classified into three groups based on their characteristics. Discriminant analysis revealed that two functions (experience and marketing) discriminate among the three groups. The two functions are particularly distinguishable by high loadings in firm experience and firm registration with client bodies. This study demonstrates that ICFs can be classified using other parameters than those traditionally in use. Future ICF development programmes could be tailored along the lines of the three distinct groups discovered in this study.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cluster analysis; contractor development; discriminant analysis; indigenous construction firms
Index terms: contractor development, programme, policy formation, cluster analysis, questionnaire, Nigeria, discriminant analysis, indigenous construction firm, loading, internet, construction industry, taxonomy, marketing
Subjects: data collection methods, business, policy studies, computing systems, data analysis and analytics, construction operations, economic analysis, management, Geography, project controls, industry analysis, statistical analysis
Topics: Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Governance, Digital Applications, Time Control, Organizational Design, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here