Building a framework for analysing the quality of life at neighbourhood level: An empirical case from Ankara

Orhan, E; Kahraman, Z E and Güngördü, N (2020) Building a framework for analysing the quality of life at neighbourhood level: An empirical case from Ankara. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 25(1), pp. 63-82. ISSN 1823-6499

Abstract

This article aims to analyse the indicators of quality of life (QoL) in a regeneration area in line with the subjective evaluations of neighbourhood residents. To this end, a total of 359 respondents were selected by random sampling in the Akpinar neighbourhood, Ankara, Turkey which was inhabited by squatter settlements and subjected to urban regeneration resulting in a substantial change in its physical, social, spatial and demographic structure. The neighbourhood was challenged by a landslide after the urban regeneration which affected the satisfaction levels of residents and constituted a contradiction for regeneration efforts. It is hypothesised that the QoL of neighbourhood residents is affected by the factors of quality of the built environment, public spaces, social environment, natural environment, services and facilities and safety. The findings indicate that neighbourhood level QoL is positively associated with the width of streets, adequacy of parking lots, adequacy of cultural facilities, adequacy of sewage and drainage systems, discreetness of inhabitants and peace and calmness in the neighbourhood. The present research contributes to the development of a more comprehensive schema for regeneration practices by considering both objective and subjective indicators and by revealing the importance of the public space's influence on the QoL for urban residents.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: neighbourhood design; perception; public well-being; quality of life; regeneration
Index terms: landslide, squatter settlement, neighbourhood design, sewage, sampling, built environment, Turkey, satisfaction, public well-being, urban regeneration, drainage, public space, quality of life
Subjects: project delivery, waste management, data collection methods, political science, environmental hazards, infrastructure and transport systems, urban design, Geography, urban design and public space, post-disaster and reconstruction, public and environmental health
Topics: Urban Studies, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Governance
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here