Simushi, S and Wium, J (2020) Time and cost overruns on large projects: Understanding the root cause. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 25(1), pp. 129-146. ISSN 1823-6499
Abstract
Time and cost overruns are a persistent problem on large projects despite apparent progress of the project management profession. This article reports on findings from research carried out on large projects in South Africa to find the root cause of this phenomenon. The article begins by investigating the existing theories on the causes of time and cost overruns followed by empirical investigation using case studies. The results showed that time and cost overruns on large projects originated from the external environment which in turn affected the organisation and the project environments. The root cause was found to be a lack of project-specific experience by the project team, external and organisational decisions in the past, community resistance and pressure on the project team and scope change drive from stakeholders. From the results, it is proposed that an effective strategy to reduce time and cost overruns should involve not only the management of the project environment but also the organisation and external environments. The article adds knowledge to the overrun causation theory and management of large projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | large projects; overrun causation theory; overruns; root cause; South Africa |
| Index terms: | investigation, South Africa, profession, project team, strategy, scope change, case study, overrun, project management, cost overrun |
| Subjects: | project delivery, institututions, project management theory and practice, data collection methods, financial and cost management, Geography, management, project controls, scope management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Cost Management, Project Management, Time Control, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here