Framework to improve the attitudes of construction workers towards safety helmets

Adade-Boateng, A O; Fugar, F and Adinyira, E (2021) Framework to improve the attitudes of construction workers towards safety helmets. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 26(2), pp. 65-86. ISSN 1823-6499

Abstract

Construction workers in various studies across the globe have indicated that there is some discomfort with the use of safety helmets, and that some workers do not use safety helmets as required, resulting in a compromise to their health and safety protection. This study investigates the processes involved in the selection and procurement of safety helmets for construction workers and assesses these efforts by interrogating the discomforts experienced by users in spite of these selection considerations. The study focuses on safety helmets used by construction workers, as this is a common form of personal protective equipment (PPE) usually given out on construction sites to prevent head injuries, which are among the severest forms of occupational accidents in the industry. Primary data were obtained through a questionnaire survey conducted with construction firms operating in Ghana and semi-structured interviews with construction workers. The findings from the study indicate that in spite of the purported considerations by construction firms in the selection and procurement of PPE, construction workers continually experience several discomforts with the use of safety helmets. The study proposes a Behaviour-Based Safety Intervention Framework to guide the selection and procurement of user-friendly PPE that improves the user experience of safety helmets.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: behaviour modification; Construction workers; Discomfort; personal protective equipment; procurement; questionnaire survey; interviews
Index terms: construction worker, personal protective equipment, occupational accident, behaviour modification, discomfort, Ghana, user experience, questionnaire, construction site, survey, construction firm, interview, health and safety, injury
Subjects: data collection methods, user-centered design, organization, practitioner, work location, health risk and incident analysis, Geography, health safety and environment, occupational health and safety management, health conditions and diseases, behavioral psychology
Topics: Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here