Evaluating the environmental performance of 3D printed shelters in Jordan

Akeila, M; Preece, C and Kuok, K K K (2021) Evaluating the environmental performance of 3D printed shelters in Jordan. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 26(2), pp. 117-134. ISSN 1823-6499

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printed shelters are an innovative housing solution for those in need of a shelter after a disaster. The Middle East generated a huge number of refugees due to internal conflicts. The technology has been investigated earlier from a cost and time perspectives and has performed better than steel shelters in Jordan. This research article investigates environmental performance of 3D printed shelters in Jordan in terms of energy, fuel, cooling and ventilation. Syrian refugees of Jordanian camps were selected as a case study. The energy simulation of the steel shelter to that of a printed shelter showed that the latter can achieve higher ventilation rates, lower energy consumption, less electricity cost and better thermal insulation than steel shelters.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: 3D printed shelters; environmental performance; energy simulation; Syrian refugees; Jordan
Index terms: ventilation, environmental performance, Middle East, housing, energy consumption, case study, energy simulation, thermal insulation, refugee, Jordan
Subjects: air quality, physical geography and landforms, energy systems, modelling and simulation, Geography, sustainability assessment, demography, data collection methods, construction type
Topics: Construction Technology, Geographical Context, Urban Studies, Construction Materials, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here