The market for green buildings in Sub-Saharan Africa: Experts' perspective on the economic benefits in Ghana

Addy, M N; Adinyira, E; Dadzoe, F and Opoku, D (2022) The market for green buildings in Sub-Saharan Africa: Experts' perspective on the economic benefits in Ghana. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 27(1), pp. 173-188. ISSN 1823-6499

Abstract

Part of the ideals of promoting sustainability is the green building (GB) concept. Nevertheless, the uptake and use of GBs amongst most stakeholders in Africa are still on the low. Despite the plethora of studies on the economic benefits of green building, there is a dearth in studying the benefits in Africa. Within these economies, the presence of market restrictions, socio-cultural and political factors may mitigate against these benefits. This study seeks to unearth the economic benefits of GBs within the context of a sub-Saharan African country, Ghana. By adopting a quantitative research approach, a comprehensive literature review was first conducted. This was followed by the use of a questionnaire survey. A structured questionnaire was issued to building consultants in Ghana to elicit their perspectives on the economic gains of GBs. Mean scores, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Kruskal-Wallis H test were respectively used to rank and assess the level of agreements amongst the various consultants on the economic benefits. Five economic benefits were identified from the study. This includes savings in energy, lower lifetime cost, lower operational cost, increased work productivity and "transforms the construction industry". The findings show that most of the economic benefits identified from literature cannot be realised in the study region, including "high return on investment" and "increase in building value". Consequently, building energy cost seems to play a crucial role in pushing the demand for the GB within the study milieu. The study provides a contextual understanding of economic benefits, useful to construction clients, property owners, real estate investors, consultants and the research environment. The findings are useful in providing market enablers to enhance a large-scale uptake of green construction. It is recommended that the provision of GBs should not be limited to only its impact on the environment and sustainability but also affordability concerns. This study provides a unique contextual perspective on the economic benefit of GB in a sub-Saharan African country.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: market; real estate; sustainability; green building; investment; productivity; client; consultant; owner; stakeholders; Ghana; quantitative research; questionnaire survey
Index terms: investor, quantitative research, Africa, owner, productivity, savings, Ghana, construction client, political factor, real estate, presence, return on investment, construction industry, agreements, energy cost, Sub-Saharan Africa, literature review, survey, property owner, questionnaire, green building, affordability
Subjects: data collection methods, practitioner, real estate economics, contract formation, regions and continents, economic analysis, data analysis and analytics, environmental science, physical geography and landforms, design practice, management, Geography, sociology, cost management, political science, industry analysis
Topics: Governance, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Contract Administration, Urban Studies, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here