Quantifying the impact of work environment factors on the variability of labour productivity in wall plastering

Agbo, E A; Izam, Y D and Ayegba, C (2022) Quantifying the impact of work environment factors on the variability of labour productivity in wall plastering. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 27(2), pp. 109-125. ISSN 1823-6499

Abstract

Variability in labour productivity is a performance inhibitor and a determinant of effective and ineffective projects. It has hampered the intercomparison of construction projects and the accurate forecasting of project duration and cost. This study chose wall plastering activities as a case study. This study aims to quantify the impact of work environment factors on the variability of labour productivity. Data were collected using direct site observations and structured questionnaires. The results revealed that “Waiting for materials” (62.4%), “Being on the job but not working” (52.6%) and “Work area congestion” (52.5%) all had negative effects on labour productivity variance. Other negative factors include “Rework” (51.7%), “Waiting for tools/equipment” (51.1%), “Waiting for information” (47.2%) and “Weather changes”. The overall average daily productivity was 1.268 whr/m2, baseline productivity = 0.993 whr/m2 and variation in daily productivity = 22.08%; where whr refers to work hours. The findings identified significant work environment factors and quantified their impacts on labour productivity variability in plastering activity. The results indicate that work environment factors during work in progress significantly impact the variability of labour productivity in plastering work and ample consideration should be given to its effects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: labour productivity; masonry construction; plastering work; variability; work environment factors
Index terms: rework, weather, questionnaire, variation, construction project, productivity, case study, forecasting, variance, variability, duration, determinant, labour productivity, work environment
Subjects: prediction and forecasting, operations management, data collection methods, risk assessment, air quality, statistical analysis, project controls, measurement and scaling, production management, contractual condition, management
Topics: Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Risk Management, Time Control, Contract Administration, Organizational Design, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here