Raphael, A O; Samuel, O S and Dipeolu, A A (2022) Evaluation of service quality gaps in construction professional service firms in Nigeria. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 27(1), pp. 25-40. ISSN 1823-6499
Abstract
The study aims at evaluating and comparing service quality of consultancy firms who provide professional services in building projects in Nigeria. The article seeks to address the general perceptions of dissatisfaction with the quality of services in order to enhance performance of building projects and ensure competitiveness in the industry. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire as an instrument of data collection. The population of the study consisted of 488 representatives of public and private clients with a sample size of 385. Data were analysed using weighted mean and paired-sample t-test to determine the severity of differences in the expected service quality and perceived service quality. The result shows significant differences between the expected service quality and perceived service quality in structural engineering, mechanical/electrical engineering and quantity surveying services along all the dimensions of service quality. However, "Tangibles" dimension of architectural services had no positive differences in the service quality, but had differences in "Responsiveness", "Empathy", "Reliability" and "Assurance" dimensions. The results imply that professional service providers require fundamental improvement in their services to their clients. This study offers an opportunity for consultancy firms to evolve global best practices by creating and maintaining high service quality as a team.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | competitiveness; liability; population; reliability; best practice; electrical engineering; quantity surveying; service quality; structural engineering; client; professional; structural engineer; Nigeria; sample size; questionnaire survey |
| Index terms: | consultancy, population, structural engineer, professional service, service quality, questionnaire, survey, liability, surveying, dimension, quality of service, construction professional, best practice, architectural service, electrical engineering, competitiveness, sample size, Nigeria |
| Subjects: | health monitoring assessment and metrics, organization, research design and methodology, business, profession, data collection methods, market analysis, demography, liability law, civil engineering, public and environmental health, performance measurement, practice management, professional development, Geography |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Quality Management, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here