Multiphase project risk management on food factory building construction: Consultant perspective

Erlita, A; Amin, M and Bintoro, B P K (2023) Multiphase project risk management on food factory building construction: Consultant perspective. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 28(1), pp. 1-17. ISSN 1823-6499

Abstract

This article reports on research on a flour mill factory building construction in Indonesia by investigating the root cause of time overrun in consultant perspective. While numerous risks are identified during the phases of construction project, it is unknown which risk is the primary cause of project delays. To have a better understanding of the optimisation of the risk management and the risk mitigation, a multiphase risk management is proposed, which is divided into four phases, namely pre-design, design, tender and construction. Employing the bow-tie analysis enables a more in-depth examination to identify the risk. From each bow-tie diagram, a detailed risk mitigation table can be formulated and made the response for each risk easier to plan. The probability impact matrix is then used to identify the risk score and to evaluate the risk. This research began by giving questionnaires to 45 qualified respondents. It was found that 45 factors that caused the delay in all phases were divided into nine factors from the pre-design phase, 14 factors from the design phase, 6 factors from the tender phase and 16 factors from the construction phase. As the final step of the risk management process, there are various responses in this research depends on their final assessment based on the scores and the questionnaire results. Factory building construction is quite different from the other type of building construction because machine design also being an important part that affects the structural, architectural, mechanical and electrical aspects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: optimisation; time overrun; construction project; construction phase; project risk management; risk management; consultant; Indonesia; probability
Index terms: building construction, construction project, questionnaire, risk mitigation, project delay, Indonesia, time overrun, project risk management, design phase, risk management, construction phase
Subjects: project controls, building construction, Geography, production management, financial risk, professional practice, project delivery, risk assessment, data collection methods
Topics: Design Practice, Time Control, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Cost Management, Construction Technology, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here