Moyo, T; Mukawa, M; Moyo, C and Chigara, B (2023) Expected competencies of quantity surveyors in Zimbabwe. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 28(1), pp. 19-42. ISSN 1823-6499
Abstract
Complex clients' requirements and numerous construction industry challenges require an interrogation of the quantity surveyor’s competencies. This article reports on a study that sought to determine the expected competencies of quantity surveyors and to establish statistically significant differences in ranking due to quantity surveyor designations. A questionnaire survey research design was employed to collect the primary data. Quantity surveyors from all quantity surveying firms and those working for construction companies in the major cities of Harare and Bulawayo in Zimbabwe participated in the study. Eight components were revealed through factor analysis, with the highest ranked component consisting of project finance control and reporting, sustainability issues and conflict avoidance management and dispute resolution procedures. While the traditional competencies of effective financial control and conflict management remain vital, sustainability issues have also become a priority. Hence, continuous professional development programmes and curricula redesigns that cater for these competencies are essential. A statistically significant difference due to the consultants' and contractors' quantity surveyor designations was revealed, indicating a differentiation of their roles. Thus, relevant weighted competency assessment frameworks also need to be instituted. However, owing to the exploratory nature of the study, only views of quantity surveyors were considered.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | sustainability; conflict management; continuous professional development; dispute resolution; financial control; project finance; quantity surveying; professional; Zimbabwe; factor analysis; questionnaire survey; client; consultant; quantity surveyor |
| Index terms: | surveying, conflict management, quantity surveying firm, programme, construction company, survey, financial control, questionnaire, Zimbabwe, project finance, differentiation, professional development, quantity surveying, research design, dispute, factor analysis, redesign, resolution, construction industry |
| Subjects: | dispute resolution, design methods, profession, data collection methods, research design and methodology, organization, health monitoring assessment and metrics, economic analysis, Geography, professional development, financial management, industry analysis, statistical analysis, conflict resolution, project controls |
| Topics: | Time Control, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Legal Issues, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here