Tehami, M and Seddiki, M (2023) Investigation toward the adoption of building information modelling in Algeria from architects' perspective. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 28(2), pp. 329-352. ISSN 1823-6499
Abstract
This study attempts to identify and assess the individual perceptions of building information modelling (BIM) benefits and implementation barriers in the construction industry in Algeria from architects' perspective. An investigation was carried out through survey questionnaires distributed to Algerian architects with different profiles. A total of 100 questionnaires were used for the study. A subgroup analysis was conducted to investigate the differences in the individual perception of the different groups of architects segmented according to the respondent’s work type, organisation size, experience length and computeraided design (CAD) and BIM knowledge. The findings of the study revealed that the most important barriers to BIM implementation were people and policy factors. The subgroup analysis revealed that the architects working for design firms were more aware and had more readiness for adopting BIM compared to those working for project owners and contractors. Moreover, there were differences in the BIM maturity level between the large and small organisations in Algeria. It was concluded that at the actual BIM maturity level, BIM implementation would not occur without the implication of local authorities and policymakers, as they have a significant impact on promoting and accelerating BIM adoption in the country.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Algeria; architect; building information modelling; implementation; maturity level; questionaire survey |
| Index terms: | survey, local authority, questionnaire, design firm, maturity level, building information modelling, Algeria, subgroup, owner, investigation, architect, construction industry, implementation |
| Subjects: | evaluation, Geography, information systems, industry analysis, research management, sociology, practitioner, data collection methods, profession, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Procurement, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here