Value-for-money drivers in public-private partnerships in affordable housing in Indonesia: An analytic network process perspective

Wibowo, A and Hartiati, D (2023) Value-for-money drivers in public-private partnerships in affordable housing in Indonesia: An analytic network process perspective. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 28(2), pp. 101-119. ISSN 1823-6499

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the factors expected to drive value-for-money (VfM) when using public-private partnerships (PPPs) for affordable housing in Indonesia. Utilising economy, efficiency and effectiveness as the VfM criteria, the study employed the analytic network process to determine the relative importance of 13 factors compiled from the literature review. The factors were then grouped into five clusters: private sector capacity, transparent and competitive procurement, risk and reward allocation, public sector capacity and the nature of the long-term contract. The data were gathered through a survey of 20 experts with hands-on experience in Indonesia’s PPPs. Effectiveness was identified as the most critical VfM criterion, implying that bringing other VfM aspects into public decisions is indefensible if the outcome, providing low-income customers with suitable housing at rents they can afford, is not achieved. The justified scope and size of the project, clear output-based specifications, quality project planning and preparation and long-term service delivery emerged as the most critical factors enhancing VfM, each with a different focus on a specific VfM criterion based on local weights. At the cluster level, risk and reward allocation ranked the highest. This study also acknowledges several limitations and provides directions for future research.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: affordable housing; analytic network process; public-private partnership; value-for-money; Indonesia; housing
Index terms: relative importance, specification, literature review, survey, project planning, housing, value-for-money, efficiency, Indonesia, service delivery, partnership, private sector, critical factor, public sector, income, affordable housing, effectiveness, analytic network process
Subjects: performance management, evaluation, service delivery, Geography, contractual condition, partnership management, administrative law, decision-making and optimization, industry analysis, data collection methods, construction type, risk assessment, control systems, economic analysis, data analysis and analytics
Topics: Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Contract Administration, Legal Issues, Quality Management, Value Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here