Exploring the temporary appropriation of marginal open spaces in urban residential neighbourhoods

Adebara, T M (2024) Exploring the temporary appropriation of marginal open spaces in urban residential neighbourhoods. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 29(1), pp. 47-65. ISSN 1823-6499

Abstract

Open spaces are essential to the liveability of urban residential neighbourhoods. While formal open spaces, including neighbourhood parks, have been extensively studied for their environmental and social values, there is scanty research on marginal open spaces' potential uses and benefits. By drawing on an empirical study of residential neighbourhoods in a Nigerian urban centre, this study explores the temporary appropriation of marginal open spaces. The study adopts a mixed-method approach using a questionnaire survey, photographic recordings, observations, open space measurements and interviews with local planning authorities. Findings showed that marginal spaces exist in various types and forms, including open areas along neighbourhood streets and stream corridors. The three major types of temporary appropriation in the residential neighbourhoods were “Informal commerce”, “Leisure/social pursuit” and “Sacralisation (religious activity)”. The most critical concerns regarding open space appropriation, measured on a five-point Likert scale, were “Lack of safety”, “Absence of tree cover/shade” and “Stench from uncollected waste”, with scales of 4.92, 4.68 and 4.42, respectively. Information gathered from the local planning authorities also showed that the users violated the planning regulations guiding the marginal spaces. The study concluded that although the temporary use of open spaces in residential neighbourhoods is essential for improving the residents' livelihoods and socio-cultural lives, the practice is fraught with several challenges. Consequently, practical policy recommendations were proffered to ensure that marginal spaces are produced as desirable areas for everyday life while maintaining hygiene, safety, cleanliness and comfort.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: marginal open spaces; Nigeria; planning law; socio-spatial exclusion; temporary appropriation
Index terms: empirical study, open space, shade, comfort, commerce, social value, everyday life, Nigeria, planning law, stream, liveability, regulation, questionnaire, Likert scale, drawing, survey, interview, local planning
Subjects: asset management, sociology, occupational health and safety management, political science, research methods, design elements, urban design, water management, Geography, technical documentation, planning law, mental health and wellbeing, data collection methods
Topics: Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Sustainability, Governance
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here