Capital budgeting implementation by public sector construction firms in tanzania's housebuilding industry: An exploratory study

Sospeter, N G and Awuzie, B O (2024) Capital budgeting implementation by public sector construction firms in tanzania's housebuilding industry: An exploratory study. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 29(1), pp. 87-109. ISSN 1823-6499

Abstract

This exploratory study investigates the implementation of capital budgeting practices (CBP) by selected public sector construction firms (PSCF) in Tanzania. This investigation seeks to assess the extent, to which such practices are used for effective investment decision-making, with a particular focus on the country’s housebuilding sector. A case study research design was adopted to collect data from five Tanzanian PSCF, serving as cases through a mix of questionnaires, interviews and document reviews. The emergent data was analysed using thematic analysis. An appreciable level of CBP implementation was observed in all the cases. The internal rate of return (IRR), net present value (NPV) and payback period (PBP) capital budgeting techniques (CBT) were observed to be mostly used by these PSCF, while sensitivity analysis was widely deployed for risk mitigation. The influence of top management in decision-making, political influence and lack of advanced software were some of the implementation challenges identified. The findings contribute to the elucidation of CBP implementation praxes in the public sector organisation context in developing countries, as it relates to the housebuilding industry in Tanzania’s unexplored context. The study proves to be a valuable resource for public sector entities in developing countries intent for facilitating effective investment decision-making about infrastructure procurement and it contributes to improving knowledge of CBP implementation, consideration of risk mitigation factors and post-project implementation audits by public sector firms.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: capital budgeting; capital budgeting; housebuilding; Tanzania; public housing development; public sector construction firms
Index terms: Tanzania, case study, capital budgeting, research design, audit, investment decision-making, public sector, net present value, public housing, investigation, implementation, housebuilding, interview, developing country, sensitivity analysis, public sector organization, construction firm, exploratory study, decision-making, top management, thematic analysis, payback, questionnaire, risk mitigation
Subjects: decision analysis, cognitive psychology, administrative law, environmental hazards, budgeting, performance measurement, management, research methods, construction integration, methods and analysis, Geography, financial risk, development economics, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, construction type, data collection methods, research design and methodology, organization
Topics: Organizational Design, Quality Management, International Construction, Legal Issues, Procurement, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Risk Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Cost Management, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here