Emsley, M (2005) A benefits analysis of partnering: A case study of a community primary school. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 10(1), pp. 69-79. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
Partnering, which involves all members of the project team working together to improve performance through agreeing mutual objectives, is a construct; on procurement strategy encouraged by the UK Government, as it believed that such a strategy will provide best value, which is an aspect especially critical for public clients. Partnering may be strategic or applied to a specific project only. A regionally based main contractor (MC) constructed the Community Primary School (CPS) for a Metropolitan Borough Council (MBC) using a project partnering arrangement; such an arrangement was also in place between the main contractor and its key sub-contractors. The overall conclusion, derived from the analysis of a case study carried out on the project, is that the CPS project has been a very successful project. Broadly, it was completed ahead of schedule, an achievement which undoubtedly would not have been possible without the use of partnering which allowed an overlap of the design and construction activities, there was a slight overspend above budget, the health and safety of people involved in its construction was not compromised and the finished product is of a high quality, fit for purpose.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | best value; case study; cost related issues; partnering; procurement; school |
| Index terms: | procurement strategy, case study, partnering, main contractor, project team, public client, design and construction, best value, strategy, health and safety, sub-contractor |
| Subjects: | health safety and environment, management, partnership management, sociology, practitioner, data collection methods, bidding, contractual arrangements, project delivery |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here