Vandalism: A product of environmental design?

Heron, E; Bowen, P and Lincoln, D (2005) Vandalism: A product of environmental design? Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 10(3), pp. 181-191. ISSN 1366-4387

Abstract

This study presents findings on the spatial distribution of vandalism and the nature and extent of vandalism within Manenberg, a residential township in the Western Cape province of South Africa. The focus of the study is on the impact of the design of the built environment on vandalism. Design factors of the built environment, most notably, the distribution and type of buildings and open spaces are examined as possible influences on the incidence of vandalism, and population density, type and size of household, and property ownership are considered as relevant demographic variables. The methodology adopted for the study involves the collection and interpretation of official police statistics of vandalism over a sevenyear period (19921999). The statistical data are combined with the 1996 population census for the area. The statistical data are examined and presented in three focus areas: the frequency of vandalism, the nature of vandalism, and the location of vandalism. The study then examines the association between the design of the built environment and vandalism levels. In conclusion, the likely cost implications of vandalism are discussed.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: crime; environmental design; manenberg; South Africa; vandalism
Index terms: demographic variable, vandalism, design factor, South Africa, methodology, population, environmental design, spatial distribution, density, statistics, ownership, built environment, household, open space
Subjects: sustainability and energy, construction operations, geographical analysis, analytical methods, mathematical modelling, demography, infrastructure and transport systems, design practice, economics, research methods, Geography, urban design
Topics: Organizational Design, Site Management, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Geographical Context, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here