Kishk, M; Pollock, R; Atta, J and Power, L (2005) A structured model for performance assessment in property management. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 10(3), pp. 159-170. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
Property performance assessment has become increasingly important in property management because of the emergence of a number of trends as issues of concern of property owners and occupiers. There are, however, many problems facing the consideration of performance measurement. Perhaps the main obstacle is the lack of a structured process for property performance measurement. The prime objective of the research work that underpins this paper therefore is to address this gap by the development of a structured model for property performance measurement. This involved three main steps. First, basic characteristics of an effective performance assessment in property managements are identified and the framework for a generic model is outlined. Next, key processes of performance measurement and property management tasks are identified. Then, these processes are set out into steps for better understanding and applicability of the model to actual property management practices. Some unique features of the model include consideration of clients and tenants requirements, integration of the functions of property management in the model and the inclusion of two property and resource databases to aid storage and retrieval of information. Besides, it is the first step in developing a dedicated computer tool for property performance assessment.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | performance measurement; process flow modelling; property management |
| Index terms: | tenant, integration, property owner, emergence, performance measurement, database, performance assessment, modelling, property management |
| Subjects: | organizational analysis, data management, assessment methods, sociology, systems engineering, performance measurement, real estate economics, analytical methods, practitioner |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Human Resources, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here