Edwards, D J and Holt, G D (2006) Hand-arm vibration controls: A perspective based on performance and cost dimensions. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 11(1), pp. 21-32. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
The Control of Vibration at Work Regulations (CVWR), quantify workplace vibration exposure using exposure action, and exposure limit values (EAV and ELV respectively). Hand-arm vibration (HAV) risk can be objectively assessed using hand-tool vibration magnitude data, for comparison to the EAV and ELV. When considering risk controls, one disadvantage of this 'focus' on vibration magnitude, is that it might deflect appreciation of the economic implications of such controls, resulting from for example: restrictions on tool usage time; the need for operator rotas where continuous tool use is required; and complications in estimating labour costs because of these types of condition. Based on a sample of hand-tools' performance data, this research developed 'hybrid' (performance/vibration) dimensions for quantifying tools' efficacy; representing (interalia) units of work achievable to reach the EAV and ELV. These hybrid dimensions characterize an alternative performance-based (and therefore financially related) way of considering a tool's 'suitability' within CVWR parameters; over and above the (selection) criterion of tool vibration magnitude. Analyses are then presented that investigate the time and cost ramifications of using multiple operators, to sustain continuous tool usage while keeping exposure levels within CVWR limits.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction tools; hand-arm vibration; labour costs; performance measurement |
| Index terms: | regulation, suitability, performance measurement, estimating, performance-based, labour cost, dimension, vibration, exposure |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, mechanical systems, performance measurement, health monitoring assessment and metrics, public and environmental health, design criteria, political science, cost management |
| Topics: | Governance, Cost Management, Procurement, Quality Management, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here