Ibrahim, A D; Price, A D F and Dainty, A R J (2006) The analysis and allocation of risks in public private partnerships in infrastructure projects in Nigeria. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 11(3), pp. 149-164. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
Governments throughout the world are being forced to review how to fund the increasing demand and rising expectations of their citizens. This is especially relevant for developing countries, which often have limited capital resources to meet the soaring needs for essential infrastructure. This has consequently led to increased involvement of the private sector in the provision of public services, using various forms of Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs). It is, however, important for both the public and private sectors to understand the various risks associated with PPPs throughout the whole life cycle of the projects in order to guarantee long-term success. This is especially true in Nigeria and other countries where the use of PPPs are still in the early stages of development. Sixty-one PPP risk factors were identified from literature and classified into exogenous and endogenous risks. This paper presents the results of the questionnaire survey that investigated the perception of Nigerian construction professionals on the relative importance of the identified risks and their preferences of allocation between the public and private sectors. The results show that the three most important PPP risk factors in Nigeria are “unstable government”, “inadequate experience in PPP” and “availability of finnance”. The respondents' risk allocation preferences show that while most of the endogenous risk factors could be assigned to the private sector partner, the public sector should retain political and site acquisition risks, while relation-ship-based risks should be shared between the private and public sector partners.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | endogenous risks; exogenous risks; infrastructure; Nigeria; public private partnership; risk allocation; risk analysis |
| Index terms: | questionnaire, preference, risk analysis, relative importance, developing country, guarantee, survey, construction professional, risk allocation, risk factor, infrastructure project, public private partnership, whole life cycle, public services, private sector, partnership, acquisition, public sector, Nigeria |
| Subjects: | development economics, professional development, financial risk, Geography, decision-making and reasoning, sustainability assessment, contract structure, environmental hazards, administrative law, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, partnership management, business, data collection methods, risk assessment, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Sustainability, Legal Issues, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here