The impact of flood insurance on residential property prices: Towards a new theoretical framework for the United Kingdom market

Lamond, J; Proverbs, D and Antwi, A (2007) The impact of flood insurance on residential property prices: Towards a new theoretical framework for the United Kingdom market. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 12(3), pp. 129-138. ISSN 1366-4387

Abstract

The supposition that the availability and cost of insurance will have an effect on house prices is often accepted as fact. However the mechanism for this supposed impact has not been clearly articulated and the hypothesis is far from proven in the UK market. Measurement of the effect of insurance is complicated by the fact that the parties are acting in the presence of incomplete information and that insurance costs can act as a proxy for other value drivers such as flood risk. Models useful in other countries cannot be applied sensibly to the UK market because of the unique properties of the UK insurance regime. Novel hypotheses are suggested for the three principal ways in which the availability and cost of insurance might influence the prospective property transfer. A method for testing one of these hypotheses is proposed using a quasi-experimental approach with the aim of determining whether a relationship between insurance cost and house price does indeed exist.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: flood insurance; flood risk; property price
Index terms: presence, testing, house price, insurance, residential property, United Kingdom
Subjects: Geography, environmental science, economic analysis, construction type, professional practice
Topics: Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here