Hui, E C M and Ivan, I M H (2008) A risk-based option pricing strategy for property valuation: An empirical study in Hong Kong. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 13(1), pp. 48-59. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to apply a risk-based option-pricing framework for property developers to come up with the critical investment timings, based on their tolerance of risk. Design/methodology/approach The viability of a project is subject to the potential benefit and market conditions. Option embedded in the project is considered a perpetual call option that is an opportunity to establish a new building on a vacant land. With the aid of scenario testing, whether the immediate implementation is appropriate or not can be examined, and which key factor(s) affects the profit most can be assessed. Findings The results reveal that the chosen study case, Chelsea Court project, is highly favorable from a financial standpoint. Research limitations/implications Since the Samuelson-McKean model specializes on non-expired options that in general fit to the evaluation of options of a land development project with no maturity, it may be limited in evaluating projects with multi-phases and a maturity date. Practical implications This valuation framework allows flexibility to assess the plausible investment timing under various suspicious circumstances about the property market. Originality/value The valuation framework presented in this paper provides advice for prospective property developers on whether to invest now or at a later stage to yield the best return.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Hong Kong; pricing policy; property |
| Index terms: | pricing, Hong Kong, option, testing, implementation, land, empirical study, profit, market condition, property market, strategy, land development, methodology |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, Geography, research methods, management, economic analysis, contractual arrangements, professional practice, real estate economics, economic and policy analysis |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Procurement, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here