Development of transparent payment systems

Motawa, I; Kaka, A and Hong Wong, C (2008) Development of transparent payment systems. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 13(2), pp. 143-156. ISSN 1366-4387

Abstract

Purpose Several types of pricing and payment systems are used in the construction industry. However, the current practice is failing to utilise the potential of a link between project performance and clients' satisfaction on one hand and stakeholders' cash flow on the other. Therefore, a paradigm shift in cash flow research is both timely and necessary. The purpose of this paper is to promote and facilitate the use of appropriate payment systems that satisfy all project members. Design/methodology/approach The research first investigates how payment systems are being selected, and the drivers for selecting innovative payment systems. A simulation and selection IT system is then developed that can be used to facilitate project stakeholders' satisfaction by selecting the most appropriate payment system for each project member. The proposed system considers alternative payment terms and conditions across the supply chain and in a transparent and negotiated manner. Findings The outcome should result in planning cash flows that satisfy all team members. The planned cash flow profiles are then used to monitor the implementation of the agreed payment system. Originality/value The main conclusion of the paper is that appropriate payment systems can act as a performance enabler and the provision of the simulation tool would result in project teams taking a more conscious and rational decision in selecting or designing these systems.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cash flow; contracts; payments; project management; United Kingdom
Index terms: simulation tool, methodology, project stakeholder, United Kingdom, cash flow, implementation, construction industry, project management, project team, paradigm, project performance, pricing, satisfaction
Subjects: research methods, education and knowledge transfer, financial management, project management theory and practice, Geography, sociology, industry analysis, analytical methods, project delivery, economic analysis, contractual arrangements
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here