Roumboutsos, A and Chiara, N (2010) A strategic partnering framework analysis methodology for public-private partnerships. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 15(3), pp. 235-246. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to view and analyse public-private partnerships (PPPs) under a strategic partnering approach between the key parties involved, i.e. public sector, private sector and lenders, and their business environment. Design/methodology/approach – A strategic partnering framework analysis methodology has been devised based on existing and well-known business strategic analysis tools (the political-economic-social-technological (PEST) and strengths-weaknesses-opportunities-threats (SWOT) analysis). The methodology consists of modules and may be used to identify the potential of strategic partnering in a sector and/or country and/or for a particular project in a procurement process. By using appropriate modules of the methodology, public sector partnering requirements or the market potential for PPPs, in general, may be assessed. Findings – The small-scale application of a module of the methodology is demonstrated through an international consultation on the influence of the present credit crunch. Findings indicate market changes and trends that may be pursued. Research limitations/implications – The proposed strategic partnering methodology may be used in all business partnership applications. Its scope is to identify the key elements on which the particular partnership should be based. Originality/value – PPPs have been viewed through finance- and service-based approaches. The present study introduces the view of a partnership-based approach. In the effort, the study also presents improvements to the commonly used PEST and SWOT analysis by adding a dynamic dimension to the analysis.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | partnership; private sector organizations; public sector organizations; strategic alliances; SWOT analysis |
| Index terms: | strengths-weaknesses-opportunities-threats, public sector organization, procurement process, framework analysis, private sector organization, methodology, public sector, private sector, partnership, strategic alliance, partnering, strategic analysis, dimension, module |
| Subjects: | organization, business, risk assessment, health monitoring assessment and metrics, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, research methods, architectural elements, partnership management, industry analysis, administrative law |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Design Practice, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Procurement, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here