Fuerst, F; McAllister, P; Van Wetering, J and Wyatt, P (2011) Measuring the financial performance of green buildings in the UK commercial property market: Addressing the data issues. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 16(2), pp. 163-185. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
Purpose Given the centrality of data and information to the evaluation and operation of policies to reduce carbon emissions, the purpose of this paper is to investigate potential sources of data within in the UK on the commercial building stock in terms of its physical characteristics, financial performance, energy consumption and environmental performance. The research aimed to increase understanding of the potential sources of data on property attributes, financial performance and energy use or environmental performance, with a particular emphasis on evaluating their strengths and weaknesses in terms of scope, quality, availability and practicability. Design/methodology/approach This is an explorative, qualitative study that uses semi-structured interviews conducted with 11 different data holding organisations. Findings Whilst public sector organisations have the potential to provide the data required for large samples, there are major barriers to obtaining and linking the different databases. Data on the three key data elements (prices, attributes and environmental performance) tend to be split between different governmental agencies. There are likely to be substantial problems (and costs) of linking the databases due, in particular, to definitional differences. There is a conflict between government's public good objective of increasing knowledge of the environmental performance of buildings and its objective of maximising revenues from the commercial exploitation of data. Since the private sector organisations that hold data are commercially motivated, the samples that they have gathered are largely client driven and, consequently, tend to be partial, particular, proprietary, private and product-related. Originality/value Since pricing studies are central to evaluating the effectiveness of eco-labelling in property markets, this paper improves one's understanding of the role of information and data barriers to improving the allocative efficiency of commercial property markets.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | commercial property; data; eco-label; environmental performance; financial performance; prices; real estate; United Kingdom |
| Index terms: | financial performance, physical characteristic, methodology, commercial building, commercial property, green building, agency, private sector organization, interview, property market, United Kingdom, revenue, public sector organization, energy consumption, real estate, public good, effectiveness, markets, energy use, eco-label, environmental performance, efficiency, carbon emission, pricing, qualitative study, exploitation, database |
| Subjects: | real estate economics, economic analysis, energy systems, research design and methodology, organization, data collection methods, construction type, climate science, sociology, data management, administrative law, research methods, business analysis, performance management, design practice, sustainability assessment, management, material properties and characteristics, Geography |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here