Motivation and incentives in relational contracts

Pasquire, C; Ballard, G; Darrington, J W and Howell, G A (2011) Motivation and incentives in relational contracts. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 16(1), pp. 42-51. ISSN 1366-4387

Abstract

Purpose Lean projects seek to optimise the project rather than its parts and to maximize value to the customer. To better align the behaviour of project participants with a Lean project delivery model, the purpose of this paper is to argue for compensation structures that better address the economic and non-economic motives that impact project performance. Design/methodology/approach Social science research increasingly shows that non-economic human motives play a key role in job performance and that they interact in complicated ways with economic incentives. By reviewing and extrapolating from relevant literature, this paper explores certain key non-economic human motives and their impact on project performance, how these non-economic motives interact with economic incentives, and strategies for structuring effective incentives. Findings The paper identifies certain contract incentive principles that the authors believe should promote non-economic motivation. Research limitations/implications The paper provides a starting point for further research regarding compatibility of incentives with non-economic motives on Lean projects. In particular, more research is needed on the applicability of the social science findings to corporate entities. Practical implications The paper suggests that traditional compensation systems are ill-suited to project-optimised behaviour. Originality/value This paper provides important insight into the problems of traditional compensation systems for construction projects and offers both concepts and strategies that could better align economic incentives with project-optimised behaviour.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: incentives; psychology; project management
Index terms: economic incentive, motivation, strategy, psychology, methodology, construction project, motive, project management, lean project delivery, compensation, project performance, social science
Subjects: behavioral psychology, production management, project management theory and practice, theoretical framing, management, research methods, lean construction, economic analysis, psychology, dispute resolution
Topics: Legal Issues, Human Resources, Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here